Which of the following best defines command within the context of incident management?

Command in the context of incident management is best defined as the act of directing by explicit authority. This definition emphasizes the important concept of command being exercised by individuals who have been given the formal power and responsibility to make decisions and direct operations during an incident. In an emergency or incident response situation, command is crucial for ensuring a coordinated and effective response, as it establishes clear lines of authority and accountability.

When command is explicitly authorized, it implies that the individual in charge has been granted the necessary authority to lead teams, allocate resources, and implement strategies aimed at achieving incident objectives. This structure is vital for maintaining order, ensuring that all responders are on the same page, and enhancing overall situational awareness.

The other definitions fall short of capturing the full essence of command in incident management. For instance, directing without authority might lead to confusion and lack of alignment, while simply following orders does not encapsulate the proactive and leadership aspects of command. Finally, managing resources effectively is certainly part of the responsibility of a commander but does not fully encompass the broader scope of command in terms of leadership and decision-making authority.